Animal Scientists vs Anthropologists and Archeologists
Side-by-side salary and career comparison using Bureau of Labor Statistics data.
Animal Scientists
$68,940
median annual salary
Anthropologists and Archeologists
$70,770
median annual salary
Anthropologists and Archeologists earns $1,830 more per year (3% higher)
This side-by-side compares Animal Scientists (SOC 19-1011) against Anthropologists and Archeologists (SOC 19-3091) using BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics from May 2025 plus BLS Employment Projections covering 2023–2033. The national median pay gap is $1,830/year (3%), favoring Anthropologists and Archeologists. Total U.S. employment sits at 3,100 for Animal Scientists and 8,990 for Anthropologists and Archeologists, which matters when judging how competitive the market is on either side.
Career trajectory diverges as well: BLS projects Animal Scientists employment to change +5.8% through 2033 versus +3.7% for Anthropologists and Archeologists, a difference of 2.1 percentage points. Annual openings (growth + replacement combined) are projected at 0.2 for Animal Scientists against 0.8 for Anthropologists and Archeologists. Entry-level education also differs — Animal Scientists typically requires Bachelor's degree while Anthropologists and Archeologists typically requires Master's degree — which shapes both time-to-entry and starting salary.
Salary comparisons mask enormous state-level variation. This page's state-by-state table shows where each occupation pays best relative to the other — 13 states have reported wage data for both occupations, and the top-paying metros can exceed the national median by 20-40%. When weighing these two careers, look past the headline median: check the 10th-to-90th percentile spread to understand ceiling and floor, compare the state where you actually want to live, factor in the educational and experience investment required to enter, and keep in mind that BLS wage data excludes employer benefits, stock options, tips, and bonuses which can shift total compensation by 20-40%. Both sides of this comparison link through to full national profiles where you can run those deeper checks before making a career decision.
Salary & Career Comparison
| Metric | Animal Scientists | Anthropologists and Archeologists |
|---|---|---|
| Median Salary | $68,940 | $70,770 |
| Median Hourly | $33.14/hr | $34.02/hr |
| Mean Salary | $88,350 | $75,620 |
| 10th Percentile | $44,350 | $49,050 |
| 90th Percentile | $166,000 | $108,060 |
| Total Employment | 3,100 | 8,990 |
| Job Growth (2023–2033) | +5.8% | +3.7% |
| Annual Openings | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Education | Bachelor's degree | Master's degree |
| Work Experience | None | None |
Salary by State
States where both occupations have reported wage data, sorted by salary difference.
| State | Animal Scientists | Anthropologists and Archeologists | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas | $132,830 | $67,700 | +$65,130 |
| Kansas | $80,090 | $41,870 | +$38,220 |
| Maryland | $77,750 | $54,160 | +$23,590 |
| Minnesota | $88,640 | $65,920 | +$22,720 |
| Wisconsin | $84,310 | $63,130 | +$21,180 |
| South Dakota | $77,300 | $63,130 | +$14,170 |
| Washington | $83,160 | $74,790 | +$8,370 |
| North Dakota | $72,100 | $63,830 | +$8,270 |
| Iowa | $75,290 | $67,270 | +$8,020 |
| Pennsylvania | $77,660 | $79,660 | $-2,000 |
| Michigan | $60,010 | $64,700 | $-4,690 |
| Illinois | $47,930 | $59,560 | $-11,630 |
| Nebraska | $55,300 | $94,520 | $-39,220 |
Also Compare
View Full Details
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics — Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (May 2025 release). Salary figures are annual medians and percentile bands published by BLS.
Common Questions
Which pays more, Animal Scientists or Anthropologists and Archeologists?
Which has better job outlook?
Where does this data come from?
Last updated: May 2025 (BLS OEWS annual release). Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (OEWS), May 2025.