Top 10 Highest-Paying US States by Average Occupational Median Wage

WageDex ranks all 50 US states by the average occupational median wage across all observed occupations in BLS OEWS data. Updated automatically as new BLS data is published.

Research period:

Compiled by WageDex Editorial on 2026-05-16

Research question

Among 50 US states in the BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics dataset, which states have the highest average occupational median wage across all observed occupations, and how does state-level wage variation compare to national medians?

Methodology

This ranking is compiled directly from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics state-level records, no figure is typed in by hand, and the numbers update whenever the underlying dataset is refreshed. States with no recorded median-wage data are excluded from this ranking rather than shown with a zero, since a true zero and "no data reported" are different facts.

Where BLS suppresses a value (for confidentiality, small sample size, or quality control), that record is left out of this ranking rather than displayed as zero. If BLS later revises a figure, the revision appears here automatically the next time WageDex refreshes its data, no manual edit to this page is needed.

A named editor reviews this page before publication, and disputed figures can be corrected through the contact channels in the footer, corrections are reconciled against the official source record before anything changes here.

See the methodology page for the complete data-update process, source vintage, and field definitions.

Top 10 Highest-Paying US States by Average Occupational Median Wage

Compiled directly from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

annual wage
Source U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, OEWS As of May 2025

The ranked top 10

Every row below reflects the current 10-record ranking. Refresh the page after WageDex's next data update to see the latest values.

# State Avg median wage Avg mean wage Occupations covered
1 District of Columbia 89678.5775862069 94986.46551724138 464
2 Washington 86472.35449735449 89813.5582010582 756
3 New York 83188.62113402062 88291.53350515464 776
4 California 83172.21941992434 88853.77049180328 793
5 Massachusetts 81220.85076708508 85161.45048814506 717
6 New Jersey 80365.96467391304 84642.94836956522 736
7 Minnesota 79900.56944444444 82014.44444444444 720
8 Alaska 79598.90410958904 82113.99217221135 511
9 Maryland 79476.46978021978 82998.26923076923 728
10 Rhode Island 78208.76838235294 81299.48529411765 544

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, BLS OEWS State Wage Estimates. Values reflect WageDex's current data snapshot and update whenever the underlying dataset is refreshed. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, BLS OEWS State Wage Estimates. Values reflect WageDex's current data snapshot and update whenever the underlying dataset is refreshed.

Findings

Top entity in the ranking

The top-ranked record in this dataset is District of Columbia, with a value of 89678.5775862069 on the Avg median wage column. The full top-10 set is shown in the table above; no number here is typed in by hand. When U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a revision, the ranking and this text update automatically the next time WageDex refreshes its data.

Distribution shape

The gap between the top-ranked record (89678.5775862069) and the 10th-ranked record (78208.76838235294) characterizes how concentrated the top of the distribution is. Where the top value is many multiples of the median value of the visible set, the population is highly concentrated, a small number of entities accumulate the bulk of the measured quantity. Where the top and bottom of the visible set are close together, the distribution is relatively flat across the top end. The full distribution beyond this top-10 cut is summarized in the aggregate context section below and explored in the linked entity profiles.

Aggregate context

Across the full areas population, the aggregate query returns the following summary statistics. These anchors situate the top-10 ranking against the underlying population: how many records exist in total, what the sum of the ranking column is across all qualifying rows, and what the mean per-record value looks like. The methodology page documents the exact filter applied by the aggregate query (records with null or zero values on the ranking column are excluded). The aggregate row is computed by the same database engine that renders the ranking above, against the same snapshot.

Source provenance

The records in this ranking originate from U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, specifically the BLS OEWS State Wage Estimates. WageDex compiles this data directly from the agency's published release; there is no static export carrying stale numbers, and an updated dataset propagates to this page within hours. The methodology page documents the source URL, the data vintage, and how the figures are derived.

Why this ranking matters

Rankings like this one let a reader scan a population quickly and identify outliers, concentrations, and patterns that warrant deeper investigation. The detail pages linked from each entity in the table above give the full per-entity context: time-series history where available, related metrics from adjacent tables, and links onward to the underlying source records. The methodology page explains how an entity earns inclusion in the dataset and how the ranking column is computed at the source.

What this analysis cannot tell us

Averaging occupational medians across a state weights each occupation equally regardless of its employment share, a state with high-paying occupations that employ few workers and low-paying occupations that employ many will show an average that does not reflect the typical worker's wage. The average-of-medians construction is intentional for cross-state comparison of wage levels rather than population-weighted income, but it is not a state median household income or a state per-capita income measure. BLS OEWS state wage estimates can have noisier estimates for thinly-populated occupations in small states, the n_occupations filter at 100 prevents the smallest states from showing unstable averages. Wage data excludes the same items as national OEWS (tips, overtime premiums, stock compensation, top-coding above $239,200). Cost-of-living differences are not adjusted in the headline figure, see the metro_rpp tables for regional price parity context.

Secondary cut from the same source

Top 10 states by average occupational mean wage, high-end pull contrast

annual wage
Source U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, OEWS As of May 2025

Sources